Archives
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
Blog : Mideast Turmoil
July 20th, 2006
The mistake that North American media is making is one of focus. They are focusing on the evacuation from Lebanon. The evacuation is a major story, but the real concern, and thus the spotlight, needs to be on further escalation.
By escalation, I am not meaning an increase in intensity of operations. Rather, I am referring to further nations getting involved.
In the last two years, every major leader from the six main countries in the mideast has changed. Iran, Israel, Palestine, Syria, Lebanon, and Jordan. No one yet knows their policies, their motivations, or their political style.
For example, one can not yet know how Ahmadenijad in Iran will react to an Israel invasion of Lebanon.
Olmert, Prime Minister in Israel, is being tested for the first time. How far will he push the envelope?
In the mideast, there are more unknowns and wildcards than at any time in the last thirty years. That is why it is frightening that most people think, "this is just another part of the same old story of mideast violence."
It is quite the opposite actually.
Some of the latest causes for concern:
- Israel is hinting at full-scale invasion of Lebanon
- Iran has stated that any strikes against Syria will be met with military response from Iran
- Russia has made strong comments against Israel's military actions and called for immediate ceasefire
- U.S. has taken the opposite position to that, saying that Israel has the right to take whatever actions necessary to ensure security
- even nations like China have been getting involved in the diplomatic process
Much like Korea and Viet Nam, the mideast could potentially act as a theater for the ideological and political positions of bigger nations. (Lines will be drawn between U.S, UK, Israel, France on one side, versus Russia, China, Iran, Lebanon, and Syria.)
This is not implying war, just all the military and political posturing that comes with it.
The worrisome aspect of issues like this, is one truth that has been proven hundreds of times in the history of mankind. Nations do not walk away from conflict. They get involved. I expect that this conflict is just getting started.